Analysis by Willis Towers Watson finds the current formula is causing higher premium rates, reduced competition and poor value for consumers
LONDON, Thursday 16 March, 2017 — Willis Towers Watson has responded to a European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) Discussion Paper on the upcoming review of Solvency II, where it has identified significant flaws in the formula used to calculate the risk margin and recommended a fundamental review of its methodology and calibration.
Kamran Foroughi, Director at Willis Towers Watson, said: “We believe the high level of risk margin currently attached to long-term insurance products is resulting in higher premium rates and reduced competition, leading to worse value for consumers.”
Willis Towers Watson’s submission notes that the risk margin has become a much more material component of insurers’ balance sheets, leading to a number of challenges and changes in business practice, including:
• Asset Liability Matching. Insurers’ ALM challenges related to risk margin have been exacerbated by falling interest rates.
• Risk transfer. The bigger the risk margin relative to the rest of the technical provisions, the more insurers are incentivised to offload risk to reduce the risk margin.
This can be done via reinsurance to a company outside the EU which is not bound by Solvency II rules. Continue reading Flawed Solvency II risk margin is hurting consumers
The implementation of Solvency II in Europe has provided an additional risk management tool to owners of European captives, but at a cost, forcing risk managers to re-examine whether they are getting the best use out of their captives.
Solvency II, the European Union-wide risk-based capital rules for insurers and reinsurers, came into force in January 2016, and with it came new elements that have affected captives, for better or for worse.
“What we’re seeing as managers is an increased interest in strategic reviews and companies re-examining the captives to explore optimization opportunities and thus potentially…
Continue Reading “Solvency II complicates captive strategies ” at Business Insurance News
The Bank of England has dealt a blow to UK insurers hoping for a quick fix to what they see as the most onerous aspects of EU capital requirements.
The insurance industry has been campaigning for a more lenient interpretation of EU rules known as Solvency II. Some insurers have accused the central bank of “gold plating” the regulatory regime, which is supposed to be applied equally across the EU.
But in a speech to the Association of British Insurers on Tuesday, David Rule, the BoE’s head of insurance supervision, said its implementation of Solvency II had been “robust but proportionate” and played down the potential for immediate changes.
Continue Reading “Bank of England defends implementation of Solvency II rules” at Financial Times
The capital regime for the insurance industry needs “fundamental” review, a committee of MPs has been told.
Legal & General and Prudential both appeared before the Treasury Select Committee yesterday (25 January) to criticise the Solvency II regime.
The cross-European regime came into effect a year ago and sets out how much capital insurance companies must hold to reduce the risk of insolvency.
Continue Reading “Insurers warn of Solvency II impact ” at FT Adviser News
The debate about the solvency ratio for medical aids is nothing new.
The legislated requirement of 25% needs to be revisited to move away from the one-size-fits-all scenario.
The Medical Schemes Act No 131 of 1998 requires that medical schemes, “shall at all times maintain its business in a financially sound condition”.
This means that the medical scheme has sufficient assets for generally conducting it business, providing for its liabilities at all times and for meeting prescribed solvency requirements of 25%.
In a post-Solvency II world and against the backdrop of the UK’s leaving the EU, Malta can offer companies a robust regulatory regime, access to Europe and innovative structures such as protected cell companies and ILS, Penny Hudson at Artex Risk Solutions tells Monte Carlo Today.
The attraction and benefits of Malta as a domicile are already established, although the jurisdiction is seeing potential enhancement due to the UK’s planned exit from the European Union as it will reap the rewards of its own EU membership and sustained investment in its regulatory regime, infrastructure and education system needed to support its fast-growing financial services sector.
That is the view of Penny Hudson, director and head of the Malta office at Artex Risk Solutions, the specialist in insurance management and alternative risk programmes.
Continue Reading “Malta: a gateway to Europe” at Intelligent Insurer News
No doubt, customers are more and more decisively holding the central spot in the insurance business, their needs and characteristic being more clearly outlined thanks to the digital technologies’ contribution.
On the supervision side, customers’ rights protection is also becoming the current paradigm. “The ultimate goal of Solvency II is consumer protection,” Sergej SIMONITI, Director of Insurance Supervision Agency of Slovenia, stated in this respect on the occasion of the insurance conference recently held in Ljubljana.
Continue Reading “Ljubljana, “SII Lessons Learned” conference: Solvency II helps ensure policyholders protection and ultimately increase the trust in the system” at All About Insurance News
As the EU’s new regulatory regime settles in, Milliman’s Oliver Gillespie observes insurers facing greater uncertainty about their actions, confusion among investors and more volatility in their balance sheets
With Solvency II
having been implemented at the beginning of this year, already a number of expected and unexpected factors from the massive regulatory regime change have started to hit.
Activities such as restructuring, acquisitions or merging funds have in some ways become more difficult to assess.